2. The crime of this case is deemed to require a strict punishment against the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant assaulted the victim E and F in collaboration with the victim E and F without any particular reason, and the defendant wearing a uniform after receiving 112 report, and the crime's nature and circumstances are not good. On the other hand, the defendant confessions the crime of this case, and the defendant is against himself, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in the state of drinking, and the part of the police's injury to the police officer was committed in the state of drinking. The victim E and F did not want the punishment against the defendant. The defendant did not want to be punished against the defendant, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. are considered to have been committed in the state of drinking, and the defendant's injury to the police officer was committed in the state of drinking, and the victim E and F did not seem to have a significant degree of injury to the defendant. Thus, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.