If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On May 23, 2019, at around 13:30 on May 23, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) talks that the victim C (here, 41 years of age) on the 79th hotel in Songpa-gu Seoul (hereinafter “D”) had a female customer on the name of the manager from the foreign female customer in the D’s “D”); (b) when the victim contacted the said hotel safety team, and became a staff member, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for approximately 30 minutes, such as “I am, Chewing, and I have to talk if I have to talk.”

2. The Defendant damaged the property of the victim, at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), by 30,000 won of the victim E’s market price, putting the cryp of cryp on the substitute bed up the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the market price, thereby destroying the property of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business and Selection of Fine) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;