However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crails car.

At around 18:40 on June 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded straight along the intersection in front of the Jeju City along the intersection from the intersection to the intersection of the two-lanes (excluding the two-lanes at the intersection) from the intersection to the intersection of the intersection.

At the same time, there was a blind-distance intersection in which signal apparatus was installed, so in such a case, the person engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had the duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the direction while displaying the signal signal of the electric-way signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, even though the signal signal of the front signal apparatus was red, entered the intersection as is, and proceeded to the left left at the right-hand left-hand left-hand side of the front side of the Fschton car driven by the victim E(54 years old) driving at the right-hand left-hand side of the moving direction in accordance with the left-hand left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as catum salt, which requires three weeks of medical treatment, to the above victim and the victim G (the 39 years of age) who is a passenger of the damaged passenger vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to E (Simplified traffic);

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Medical certificates (E, G);

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One month to five years of credit cooperatives;

2. Scope of recommendations on the sentencing criteria: A general traffic accident in April to October of the credit cooperative.