If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who worked as a human father in the Kim-type operated by the victim B.

1. On May 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) calls from the victim on May 20, 2017, and calls from the victim, the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) “Freging the victim’s telephone on May 20, 201; (d) the need for hospital expenses; and (e) the amount of KRW 2 million was not paid;

Now, after completing treatment, I will help to go to the Non House.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the injured party, he did not intend to work in the form of the victim's operation.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a transfer of KRW 2 million from the national bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant around 19:00 on May 20, 2017 from the victim.

2. On June 2, 2017, the Defendant’s fraud: (a) on June 2, 2017, the phone called to the victim from the time unfortunateed from June 2, 2017, and, thus, there is a lack of money that the Defendant would have to release him from her.

500,000 won shall be deposited in a week.

He release and Dol Dol Dol Dol Dol Dol Dol.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the injured party, he did not intend to work in the form of the victim's operation.

Around June 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred KRW 500,000 to the national bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant around 19:42, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a financial transaction statement and the result of a program for submitting smartphone evidence;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that there are many criminal records of the same kind of sentencing as the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant recognized his mistake and is in profoundly against himself.

The amount of damage is so great as to be suffered;

shall be deemed to be.