보조금관리에관한법률위반등
Defendant
A Imprisonment for a year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant C’s incorporated association for a fine of KRW 7,00,000.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
An incorporated association C (hereinafter referred to as the "C") is a corporation with the purpose of comprehensive development research, etc. related to the safety of living and water safety with its location in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Buildings and E.
Defendant
A is the operator of the F (hereinafter referred to as the "Research Institute") having an office in the same place as C, and the operator of the G office, and Defendant B is the person who works as the head of C.
1. Defendant A
(a) Where a business owner illegally receiving subsidies for employment promotion concludes a employment promotion program publicly notified by the Minister of Employment and Labor and maintains employment for at least three months after hiring the unemployed who registered for a job, the subsidies for employment promotion may be paid from the Ministry of Employment and Labor;
After completing the employment assistance program, the Defendant had already been employed and worked by the employees of C and C and H, had the best amount of the employment promotion subsidy to be paid as if they were employed by registering the job seeking, and ordered B and H to do so.
B announced by the Minister of Employment and Labor and ordered his employees to complete the employment assistance program implemented in I, and H applied for employment promotion subsidy to the Ministry of Employment and Labor with relevant data attached.
In collusion with B and H on July 28, 2016, the Defendant applied for employment promotion subsidy to J by submitting a false employment contract, etc. as if he/she was employed on March 21, 2016 after completing the above employment support program on or around March 20, 2016. On or around August 5, 2016, the Defendant received employment promotion subsidy from the Ministry of Employment and Labor around August 5, 2016.
In collusion with B and H, the Defendant, including this, had been employed in the same manner from around that time to May 15, 2017 by the employees, such as J, etc., employed by the same method, deceiving the Ministry of Employment and Labor through employment assistance programs, and 25 times as indicated in attached Table 1.