However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 00:00 on July 23, 2014, the Defendant driven a B-ro car while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.060 percent from the section of approximately 5km to the front road of the Seogu Seogu Seo-gu Seo-gu, Seogu, Daegu-gu, the two Dongs of Daegu-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant was driving under influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant, at the time and time indicated in paragraph (1), talked about the Defendant’s type E personal information, who was a usual person who was requested to take a drinking level by the police agency of the Gyeong-gu Police Agency of the Gyeong-gu Police Agency of the Gyeong-gu Police Agency and the C District of the Gyeong-gu Police Agency, and signed the “E” in the driver’s signature column of the report on the 1st century statement, and submitted the forged E’s signature to D, who was aware of the forgery, to be bound into the investigation record.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising authority, forged another's signature without authority and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written circumstantial statements of a host driver;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of confession, reflectiveness, drinking alcohol, etc.);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;