The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the first instance judgment) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “change in the form and quality of land,” and legitimate acts in violation of the Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Development Restriction Zones in violation of logical and empirical rules, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.