전자금융거래법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant is a door-to-door engineer, who is a university student, and its income is difficult to impose a fine. In light of the fact that the means of access transferred by the Defendant were used for the Bosing crime, the Defendant’s punishment of the lower court (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.
2. In light of the judgment, the Defendant’s use of all the means of access to corporate banks, C and E, which had transferred without verifying the identity of the other party’s identity, led to multiple victims of fraud, and failed to specifically anticipate the circumstances that the Defendant would have been used for any crime.
Even if the means of access, which is prohibited from being transferred to another person, could have been sufficiently predicted that it will be used for illegal purposes in light of the transfer process, and considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of violation of the Petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act or the crime of this case, which is subject to criminal punishment on three occasions in the past, and that all of the crime of this case is not liable for social harm for his own interest, it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable even considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant's assertion.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.