A. In fact, the Defendant did not have any her but the victim E’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her, but this was made a telephone call with the victim, and the Defendant’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her part

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, thereby misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence of the lower court that sentenced the Defendant to a fine of 6,00,000 won and the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant had no intention to commit an indecent act against the Defendant, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, in the lower court’s determination on the assertion of mistake of facts.

The court below asserted that ① the victim consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the defendant's " was changed from the defendant while he/she entered a divided register and facsimile number on the side of the defendant who was living alone."

The phrase " .......... after being able to write his her son's son's son, the she immediately left the son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son.

On the other hand, the defendant is somewhat little about the victim's physical contact.