A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and by a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. Defendant B, “A around May 19, 2010, lent KRW 120,000 to the victim A, the bank shall bear the person, and the following month, until June 18, 2010, Defendant B, including KRW 130,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 were to be paid.

In order to induce the damaged person, the damaged person was issued KRW 120,000 from the damaged person as the borrowed money.

During the trial of the 2014 High Order 4799 Dec. 1, 201, prosecuted as the facts charged to the purport that “A has induced A to make a false testimony.”

On November 10, 2014, at the coffee shop located in front of the Seoul Eastern District Court around 17:00, the Defendant confirmed that “The remainder will give priority to 30 million won and last her, which is a witness to the trial in which collateral is offered, and that it is well her in a fluent manner.” Specifically, the Defendant confirmed that “at the time of borrowing money from the party, the Defendant would make a statement that he would repay the money to the party, and that he would continue to pay the money to the party after the due date.”

The testimony was called as "a request for testimony," and the testimony was made to him/her for perjury.

Therefore, at the court of Suwon District Court No. 208, Nov. 12, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the fraud Defendant case No. 2014 High Order No. 4799, May 12, 2014 to A, and tried to verify the Defendant’s asset status at the time of lending money to the Defendant.

The prosecutor’s question “ has sufficient capability to complete”.

“I have testified” and “I have confirmed it.”

The prosecutor’s question, “I knew that there was property owned by the Defendant and real estate.”

A witness does not receive reimbursement of KRW 250,000,000 at the request of the defendant around June 18, 2010, which is due date, and as before, the defendant bears a bank loan of KRW 250,000,000.