However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

Defendant

A, as the business owner of the "D" massage treatment place in Jeju, the owner of the "D" massage treatment place, and the defendant B, as the head of the business office of the above massage treatment place, managed the employees and notified the customers in return for the payment from the customers.

Defendants: (a) installed a bet room on about 70 square meters in the first floor of the relevant massage treatment place; (b) installed a bet room and a bet room equipped with a bath, mathy, sexual intercourse, etc., at around 60 square meters underground; and (c) on May 7, 2015, at the relevant massage treatment place, the Defendants received KRW 1.50,000 per man in return for massage and sexual intercourse, etc. from three male grandchildren, E, etc.; and (d) had three persons, such as F, etc., of the relevant massage treatment place, perform sexual intercourse, etc. with the said guests; and (e) on May 23, 2015, the Defendants received KRW 150,000 in return for massage and sexual intercourse from a police officer under control at around 0:15,00 and ordered G workers in the relevant massage treatment place to perform the said sexual intercourse, etc.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange commercial sex acts for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Written statements of J, K, L, and M;

1. A report on the control of public morals business offices;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an on-site photograph, on-site photograph, business registration certificate, and certificate of completion of report;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 19(2)1 of the same Act.

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation Defendant B: The sentencing guidelines for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the scope of recommendation, sentence (the sexual traffic crime group, the sexual traffic crime subject to the age of 19 or older, the sexual traffic crime subject to the age of 19 or older, the arrangement of sexual traffic, etc.; (b) the basic area; (c) six months to one year and four months); and (d) the conditions favorable to the determination of the sentence as ordered: