When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant called “C” in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

However, from June 27, 2015 to February 27, 2016, the Defendant purchased 150km (435,000 won) of the bones of Canada’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Gyeongcheon-gun’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic of Korea’s Republic.

As above, the Defendant prepared and sold sugars containing the bones of Canada, including swine, and puts indications that may cause confusion as to the origin of pigs and other boness.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site filming of the violating company;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the current status of delivery, such as C cafeterias, of the bones of Canada;

1. Relevant Article 15 of the Act on the Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 of the Act on the Selection of Origin of Agricultural and Fishery Products (excluding punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the fact that there is no criminal record, in addition to the punishment once imposed on the grounds of the sentencing of the same kind of fine in 1994;