도로교통법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, and the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant is found to have changed the course to a single lane without giving signals to overtake the pre-paid vehicle, which entered the right side of the intersection into the intersection, at the time and place of the court below's ruling, by using hand, direction or light in order to overtake the pre-paid vehicle, at the right side of the intersection.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.