The evidence seized shall be confiscated from the accused.

The 3754 of the 2018 Highest 3754 adopted a false statement to the victims, such as the fact that the victims need to be established and investigated by misrepresenting the public prosecutor or the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service by calls to many unspecified victims, and that there is a need for the victims to commit the phishing crime by deceiving money from the victims.

On October 2018, the Defendant: (a) reported the writing seeking part-time students in C; and (b) conspireded with the unsatisfics in contact with the unsatisfics; (c) sent documents and received money to the victims; (d) subsequently, (d) charged the victims with the role of transferring the amount of damage to the account designated by the unsatisfics; (d) printed out and prepared the false documents, etc. of the Financial Supervisory Service in the PC room; and (e) conspired to participate in the criminal conduct of satisfics.

1. On October 16, 2018, the influor of the name of fraud against the victim B calls the victim B at around 12:00, and misrepresenting the inspection with the investigator of the Financial Supervisory Service on the part of the victim B, “it is necessary to confirm whether there are two bankbooks in the name of the party, and whether there is an illegal fund,” and may conduct a binding investigation and conduct a recording investigation depending on the cooperation, because the credit rating has been lowered, it will not be a loan;

In order to confirm this, the phrase “a loan must be obtained from the maximum amount of money to the victim,” allowing the victim to borrow KRW 14 million from Samsung Card, and then, again, the phrase “a loan should be recovered immediately if it is confirmed that the test fund to conduct a recording investigation is not illegal.” On October 17, 2018, the victim urged the victim to withdraw KRW 14 million in cash and enter the same into a plaza parking lot in the Dong-gu Daejeon Daejeon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the other hand, at the time of confirming whether the loan fund is illegal.”

The defendant continues to do so according to the direction of the handicapped.