도로교통법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) around 10:25 on December 18, 2013, the Defendant is likely to obstruct the normal passage of other vehicles running in the same direction while driving a five-lane road in the direction of the Gangseo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, along the two-lane road, along the two-lane road, which is located in the direction of the network of Mapo-gu, along the two-lane; and (b) on December 18, 2013, the Defendant violated the method of change, such as changing the two-lane line by changing the two-lane line, while driving a motor vehicle into the two-lane line, and driving a five-lane road in the direction of the network of Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul.
2. The Defendant’s defense at the time of the instant case asserts that, on the wind that the E 25 tons dump truck drivened by D had not attempted to change the vehicle line at the time of the instant case, it was caused by an accident in which the vehicle driven by the Defendant was driven by the front offender while driving with the wheels of the right side while driving with the rear of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.
3. As evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements in the investigation agency and court of D, the counterpart driver, the F prepared statement, and the actual investigation report on traffic accidents.
D의 진술에 관하여 보건대, D은 법정에서 이 사건 사고 당시 2차로를 따라 진행하고 있었는데 우측 바퀴가 차선을 약간 물고 달리는 중이었고, 사고 전후로 피고인이 운전하는 차량을 보지는 못했는데 갑자기 뭔가 바퀴에 걸리는 느낌을 받고나서 멈칫 하던 차에 피고인의 차가 자신의 차 앞으로 돌면서 1차선에 있는 차를 받으면서 정차하게 되었다고 진술하였는바, D 역시 사고의 원인이나 사고 당시 피고인이 차선변경을 시도한 바 있었는지에 대하여는 잘 알지...