If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 18:40 on November 19, 2014, the Defendant demanded the victim C to enter a restaurant operated by the Government-si B, and to request the victim to drink, but “I have already withdrawn a large number of the horses,” she saw the horses as follows: (a) laid off, she was on the table, and laid off, and she was on the table, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by force. (b) On the same day, at around 20:00 on the same day, the Defendant returned to the above restaurant, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation by way of avoiding disturbance, such as cutting off, she was on the table, she was on the table, and was on the table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A report on internal investigation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;