2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 10, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Suwon Friwon method, and on February 1, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime, etc. at the same court.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with sod vehicle of C. C.

On June 18, 2017, the Defendant, even though he had been punished twice or more due to drinking driving, was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.114% in blood, and driving the said vehicle along the four-lane road near the 3-lane of the Public Procurement Service in the Dongcheon-dong, the Defendant driven the said vehicle along the two-lanes of the first village distance.

At this point, since the intersection where signal lights are located is near the intersection, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to live well on the right and the right, and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently got back of the victim D(26) who was under the signal waiting in the front section of the road, which was driven by the victim D(26) in the front section, and due to the shock, caused the said victim D’s vehicle to be fast and the victim F, who was under the signal waiting in the front section, was driven by the victim F, who was under the signal waiting in the front section.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D by the foregoing occupational negligence during approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the said A-to-purd passenger vehicle in an amount equivalent to KRW 4,125,097, and attempted to flee without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim D, even though the said C-to-purd passenger vehicle was damaged by the repair cost of KRW 1,746,698.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written estimate;

1. A medical certificate;

1. On-site photographs and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: