모욕
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On February 28, 2016, the Defendant posted a statement of “D” on the article / [C] posted the article / [a] posted on the NAV entertainment bulletin, and publicly insulting the complainant, using the Internet portal site NAB on February 14:38, 2016.
[Judgment of the court below] The defendant did not prepare the above comments in his ID, or he did not prepare them
The argument is asserted.
However, when considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, this paper does not accept the defendant's assertion since the defendant's argument is recognized as having been prepared by himself.
① The Defendant himself acknowledges that the other comments written in the same ID as the articles of E posted on the NAV entertainment bulletin board of the same day are the comments written by the Defendant directly.
In addition, the comments on the comments of this case were written in the ID of his own, but they were not written, but rather written, and it is recognized that there is no other family or person who is another family or person who is connected to the ID of the defendant and prepares the comments.
② The Defendant is the evidence that he did not prepare the comments of this case, and the Defendant posted the comments on the NAV on January 24, 2016, and recorded the comments on “from any time to any time,” and failed to transmit the data when registration is completed.
“Along with the creative nature of “,” the author would like to know what the reason is, and submitted a written question to capture the content.
It seems that there was any problem or error in preparing comments on the Defendant’s IDs.
However, the time of writing the comments of this case is different from the time when the comments were written on February 28, 2016 and one month or more.
In addition, the defendant puts comments on the article of E on the same day as the writing of this case without problem.
Therefore, the above evidence cannot be a evidence that the defendant did not prepare the comments on the instant case.
3. If the defendant alleged, then: