The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that all of the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the duty of disclosure of fraud and deception by omission.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.