공사대금
1.The following amounts, among the parts against the principal suit of the judgment of the court of first instance, exceed the amount ordered to be paid:
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the court's explanation on this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts written by the court.
[Supplementary Use] Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance
The main part of this paragraph shall be filled by the following:
C. Until that time, the construction cost due to the utility model 4,065,980 won (excluding 65,00,000 won - 13,340,000 won for the non-construction portion) x85.3% of value-added tax, and separate value-added tax) excluding the non-construction portion 4,065,980 won. In addition, the defendant's assertion that the plaintiff is liable to pay 201, 202, 301, 302, 301, 402, 401, 501, 502, 601, and 200,000 won for the above 90,000,000 won for construction work (excluding 65,000,000 won for the non-construction portion - 4,50,000 won for the non-construction portion) - 50,505,015,000 won for the plaintiff's argument as follows.
2. In addition, the Plaintiff, at the request of the Defendant’s side, constructed a balcony 16 additional construction work, and sought payment of KRW 2,400,00,00 from the construction cost. According to the appraisal by the appraiser G in the first instance trial, the Plaintiff, at the request of the Defendant’s side during construction work.