beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.07.17 2014고합661

현주건조물방화등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for five years, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A "2014 Gohap661";

A. On October 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:45, 2014, the head of the instant building and fire was frightened from his home located in Seo-gu Daegu apartment 206 Dong 1318, Seo-gu, Daegu, with a view to burning fire; and (b) with a view to burning, clothing, gas compressed containers (fung removal agents), paper paper, etc. on the inner floor, and put a fire into a dog.

Therefore, gas compressed containers have the windows of apartment complexes damaged by explosion impact while explosioning, and have them broken down on the floor board of the sloping residential area, wall wall wall wall wall wall remote area, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant destroyed the above apartment 206 apartment that is living by many unspecified people of 296 households.

B. On October 15, 2014, at around 03:00, the Defendant damaged goods used by public offices by breaking the door door of the protective detention room by breaking it into the protective detention room at around 03:40 on the same day, after showing abnormal behavior, such as dusting, drinking, etc. on the toilet, and moving it into the protective detention room to the protective detention room, in order to prevent the Defendant’s destruction of goods, by removing the door door of the protective detention room and cutting it into hand.

"2015 Gohap38"

C. When the Defendant was indicted for detention on the charge of medication by Ma who is a pro-born E (hereinafter “clopon”), and was tried for a trial, the Defendant had a mind to instigate the perjury to the effect that “the fact did not me administer the narcotics,” together with the above E.

The Defendant, from September 19, 2014 to October 1, 2014, 201, called “B, as a witness, present in the court and present E in the testimony that E does not administer a philopon.” On September 2014, the Defendant asked B to testify that E did not scopon a philopon in the street near the Daegu Northernbuk-dong located in the Pyeongtaek-gu, Seogu, Daegu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Scopon. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 25134, Sep. 19, 2014>