Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On March 4, 2015, between 11:30 on the same day and 11:40 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as: (a) within the “Dcafeteria” operated by the victim C (53 years of age and inn) of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the first floor; and (b) on the ground that the victim does not sell alcoholic beverages in accordance with the reservation; (c) “I wish to drink alcohol within the day of night; and (d) I do not want to drinking alcohol; and (d) I do not want to get the customer to enter the restaurant; and (d) I interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;