beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.12.18 2019나66269

소유권이전등기

Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. In light of the evidence submitted by the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment by the court

(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion is insufficient to recognize that there was a title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant clan on the grounds of the termination of title trust between the Plaintiff and the Defendant clan. However, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff’s owner of each of the instant land and the parties to the title trust agreement may not be deemed to have any claim against the Defendant for the implementation of the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer as to each of the instant land, and the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have any claim against the Defendant directly. The reasons why the court should explain are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.