대여금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment were lent to the defendant a total of KRW 36.7 million from April 1984 to May 1994 (i.e., loans of KRW 3.7 million from April 1984, KRW 17.7 million from May 1985, KRW 6 million from May 1985, KRW 1984,000, KRW 900,000 from May 25, 2012, and the defendant was paid a total of KRW 17 million from October 22, 2013, and thus, the defendant claimed that the remaining loans of KRW 19.7 million from April 1984 are liable to pay damages for delay.
It is not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff lent the above money to the Defendant solely on the basis of each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.
2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.