beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.11.02 2016가단8536

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. From October 17, 2014 to November 2, 2016, Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 3,851,964 and its amount.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 17, 2014, around 0:25, the Plaintiff A, a security guard, was employed by the labor union representative and the security guards employed by Company G, which is in charge of the above factory expenses, in the supply of the Jeonju factory located in Jeonju-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, and around 0:25, and around 0:00, the Plaintiff A, a security guard, took the camber while photographing the situation at the time, and the cambr in order not to take the cambr at the time, and Defendant C, a sambling the Plaintiff’s name both, and cambling the cambly with the upper part of the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff A, who was in excess of the Defendant D, was sambling the cambling with the upper part of the cambr.

B. The Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff A, such as the left-hand 4 balance of 4 weeks of medical treatment, which requires approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment, and suffered injury on the Plaintiff B, such as multi-lateral typiles, which requires approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability for damages, since the defendants intentionally inflicted an injury upon the plaintiffs by exercising their tangible power, they constitute a joint tort against the plaintiffs. The defendants are jointly and severally liable for the damages of the plaintiffs.

3. Scope of liability for damages

(a) Each description of Plaintiff A’s early stage treatment expenses of Plaintiff A, KRW 3,919,940, and KRW 3,771,860 (which is the ground for recognition) of Plaintiff B’s early stage treatment expenses of Plaintiff B, and KRW 7 and KRW 8 (including branch numbers)

B. Since Plaintiff A received hospitalized treatment for 26 days from October 17, 2014 to November 11, 2014 due to the injury described in paragraph (1), Plaintiff A received daily actual income 3,156,714, and Plaintiff B received hospital treatment for 22 days from October 17, 2014 to November 7, 2014 due to the injury described in paragraph (1), Plaintiff A received hospital treatment for 2,828,494, respectively.

According to the statements 1 and 2 of Gap evidence 6-1 and 2, the time period for the plaintiffs asserted above is at H Hospital.