Since the above golf course has a wide interval between each other, a person running a golf game has a duty of care to properly regulate the force and direction of shooting so that the golf machine does not deviate from the zone outside the zone in which he enjoys the game, and to take measures to ensure that the golf machine is not in a direction that is not intended to do so, such as "see," and to ensure that the people in the vicinity of the branch where the golf machine is anticipated to fall short of the public will be able to prepare for the hole coming in advance, despite the fact that the defendant neglected to do so by negligence that the defendant exceeded three holess in the defendant's zone, and up to five holess in the defendant's zone, thereby causing the victim D (the 49 years old) whose head was reported on the game support work within five holes, and caused the victim to suffer approximately two weeks in the middle of the day when he was in need of about 2 week medical treatment.

2. Judgment on the assertion of innocence

가. 주장 피고인은 사건 당일 티 샷 발판이 미끄러우니 잔디에서 타구를 하라는 주의를 듣지 못했고, 플레이어들이 거의 없어서 옆 홀의 누군가가 공에 맞을 수 있다고

It was not anticipated.

How a person who fails to see “the sound” should do so.

It is not at fault because it is merely a plug in accordance with the golf rules, such as a camping hole that does not hold the responsibility for the water in the middle.

The negligence of golf courses which make the facilities such as the water network poor shall be caused.

(b) Determination golf constitutes a case where sports participants in sports events jointly use facilities to achieve the same goal without physical contact, and it causes the risk of injury in ordinary cases because there is no physical contact or counter-argument different from camping districts, farming districts, etc.