2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On November 1, 2011, the Plaintiff was employed as an employee under his/her jurisdiction after becoming a member of his/her workplace (hereinafter “instant workplace”) on September 7, 2012 (hereinafter “instant accident”), and was subject to the first medical care for “the instant accident” due to the Defendant’s failure to perform medical care until September 21, 2012, and on February 8, 2013, the Plaintiff was granted the first medical care approval from the Defendant for “the front part of the front part, the lower part of the front part, the left part of the front part (hereinafter “formerly approved disease”).

B. On February 12, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care with respect to the Defendant with respect to “the change in the knife of the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife and the left knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife s

C. On February 27, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care with the Defendant by asserting that “the change in the scambling of scambling complex scambling scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscams

The Plaintiff appealed and requested an examination of the instant Disposition Nos. 1 and 2, but was dismissed on June 4, 2013 and June 20, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 27 (including all types of numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the legitimacy of the first and second dispositions of this case

A. Although the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care for the first injury and disease in the instant case, the Defendant’s additional medical care and additional injury and disease.