손해배상(기)
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 17,852,620 and KRW 6,548,520 among them.
The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows, except for the cases of dismissal as set forth in paragraph (2). Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (excluding the part concerning the conclusion of April 2) is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance (excluding the part concerning the conclusion of April 2). The second sentence of the first instance is to read “
Part 3 of the first instance judgment, " until June 22, 2017, the Plaintiff completed the re-establishment of the signboard" is dismissed as "til December 28, 2016, the Defendant completed the installation of the signboard of this case".
On the third examination of the judgment of the first instance, the first to fourth shall be followed as follows.
3) With respect to the construction cost unpaid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant, value-added tax was separately set at KRW 205,380,000, and value-added tax was imposed only when a tax invoice is issued. Accordingly, value-added tax should be excluded in calculating the construction cost. Ultimately, the amount of KRW 45,640,00 (excluding value-added tax) paid by the Plaintiff to D is 32,60,000, the total amount of wages paid by the Plaintiff directly to the Plaintiff, KRW 11,805,00, and KRW 110,800,000, KRW 15,335,000, KRW 60, KRW 700, KRW 80, KRW 700, KRW 80, KRW 170, KRW 80, KRW 170, KRW 280, KRW 70, KRW 80, KRW 170, KRW 280, KRW 197, KRW 2815.