If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a child-care center under the trade name, “C child-care center” in Article 710-dong 103 of the building B of Pakistan.

No person shall receive a subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, the Defendant

1. Around May 2012, although D(1) does not take care of D(1) at the above child care center, D’s “in May 2013,” as stated in the indictment, around May 2012, D’s Child Care Integration System managed by PPPPP, is obvious that D’s entrance registration is clerical error. From May 2012 to August 17, 2012, it receives subsidies of KRW 1,248,450 and the basic infant care fees from May 20 to August 2012 from PPP from May 2012, 201 to August 2012;

2. From August 2012 to September 2012, in collusion with the above childcare teacher E, the fact was that E did not work for the nursing relationship between the child from August 2012 to September 2012, and the childcare leave should be handled. However, the childcare integration system managed by the so-called so-called so-called “child care teacher” continued to be registered as if E had worked as a childcare teacher, and received subsidies of KRW 590,000,000, including improvement expenses, welfare expenses, etc. from August 2012 to September 2012, 2012, from August 201 to September 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the written accusation and documents attached thereto (Evidence Nos. 2 through 10);

1. Relevant Articles 54 (2) and 54 (2) of the Infant Care Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.