However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Interference with business of victims C;

A. From August 17, 2014, around 12:50 on August 17, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business by force, i.e., taking the victim’s main business by force, following the Defendant’s refusal of drinking, on the ground that the victim, who caused the Defendant to put his/her fright in a drunken manner, refuses drinking.

B. On August 31, 2014, around 01:15, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim on August 31, 2014, around 01:15, around August 31, 2014, the victim refused to sell alcohol to the Defendant for the foregoing reason, and obstructed the victim’s main business by force.

C. On August 31, 2014, around August 18:15, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the business operation of the victim’s main business by force. On August 31, 2014, around 18:15, the Defendant: (a) around August 31, 2014, the victim’s refusal to sell alcoholic beverages to the Defendant for the foregoing reason; (b) took a bath to the Defendant for about 30 minutes; and (c) obstructed the victim’s main business operation by force.

2. Around 08:50 on August 31, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim F’s business of the victim F, who was shambling at the H Beauty room operated by the victim F, shambling G on the part of the victim F, left the victim’s hambling that the Defendant’s hambing that the victim, who was hambing, caused his hair to have his hair cut after the breath of alcohol, and refused to have his hair cut, and 15 minutes of hambling, thereby obstructing the victim’s beauty room business by force.

3. Around 08:40 on September 2, 2014, the Defendant’s interference with the business of the Victim I is a method of demanding the Defendant to give a ppuri treatment on the books, glass, floor, etc. inside a pharmacy while drunkly under the influence of alcohol, despite the Victim I’s refusal to undergo medical treatment with respect to the Defendant’s request for the blood transfusion of the two descendants to the hospital.