When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 23:40 on July 21, 2017, the Defendant reported at the front of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, that he would refuse to take a taxi, and 112, sent to the site by the Defendant: D, the police box belonging to the Seoul Suwon Police Station C police station, and the police box E, who used the Defendant to have another taxi get out of the Defendant and return home; and

We see at least once after the 112-report case was taken by the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police assigned to the police.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of police officers to the site and the operation of patrol vehicles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment (excluding the first offense, confession, reflectivity, and matters not included);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;