When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is an employee of the delivery agency operated by B.

On May 3, 2015, B, around 01:15, 015, driving a C Ecub car without obtaining a driver's license from the front day of the Big Marart, which is located in the gold-ro 84, the gold-ro 84, to the front day of the GS convenience store located in the GS 25-ro 20, G.

While the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant committed the above crime, the Defendant made a false statement to the security guards E at the office of the Pakistan Police Station D, which was located on June 6, 2015, with the request of the police officer that “a request was made by the police officer to the statement that the Defendant driven the E-cubs car at the right time” from B, and that he driven the E-cubs car at the office of the Pakistan Police Station D, which was located on June 17:30, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant got the above B to escape from committing a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the provisional payment order is deemed to have been committed by the defendant present at the police according to the aiding and abetting the criminal suspect B, and the crime is disadvantageous to the nature of the crime.

However, there is no criminal power except for the defendant's violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) which has been punished once as a fine.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive of crime, circumstances after crime, etc. and all of the sentencing conditions identified in the course of trial shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the records of this case and all the sentencing conditions.