2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and his depth and reflects the defendant's depth, the defendant's service in good faith as public interest service personnel in the future, his family relationship, and the motive for the crime of this case, etc., in light of the circumstances that may be considered in part of the circumstances of the crime of this case. However, even if the defendant was placed under the direct action of suspended execution two times for the same crime, it is extremely poor that the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the suspended execution period, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and other circumstances that include the defendant's character and behavior, environment, motive and means of the crime of this case, the circumstance after the crime of this case, and the fact that the judgment of the court below becomes null and void if it becomes final and conclusive, the sentence of the court below against the

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.