The appeal is dismissed.

(F) The sentence of the original court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is reasonable to consider the confession of the defendant and reflects his mistake, that the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal record, and that the defendant is aged.

The crime of this case is obtained by deceiving a victim who is the offender by deceiving money several times, and the nature of the crime is not good, the period of defraudation is long, and the damage was almost not recovered even though the amount of defraudation is large, and it is not agreed with the victim. In addition, in full view of the following factors: the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions, such as the crime, and the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission, and the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission, such as fraud group, general fraud, type 2 (not less than KRW 100 million, but less than KRW 500,00), special fraud, decision-making on the recommended area (basic area), and the scope of recommended sentences (one to four years), it is not recognized that the sentence of the

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.