However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:50 on February 11, 2017, the Defendant, at the D office in the operation of the Defendant, located in the Chungcheongbuk-si, Chungcheongnamcheon-si, the Defendant, as well as the E and the money problems in the internal relation, putting the string of the toilets into the entrance of the toilet, and putting the string of oil on the floor as “the dead,” and continuously distributed the oil to E and the Defendant’s body.

In addition, the Defendant released the entrance out of E, closed the door, attached a locked in which he was fluored by using a one-time bags, and had him spreaded to the entire building, which is owned by F of the victims of the non-breadth.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the F-owned structure 23.4 square meters and the market value of 1.2 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each testimony of witness G and H;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify departments related to the report of investigation (report on the results of fire identification), notification on the results of appraisal of fire accidents, etc., reporting on internal investigation (Attachment to a fire site investigation report), reporting on internal investigation (in response to a request for appraisal), reporting on internal investigation (Attachment to a report on request for appraisal), reporting on internal investigation (Attachment to a photograph of crime), reporting on internal investigation (on-site identification and photo attachment), reporting on occurrence (fire), and reporting on occurrence of 12

1. Article 166 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order

1. The gist of the argument is that the Defendant intentionally committed a fire-fighting, as he argued with E, intended to smoke tobacco. The Defendant’s face, the Defendant’s face, and the clothes in which the Defendant was placed, were loaded, and the Defendant’s clothes were not loaded.

2. The evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court can be recognized as a whole.