2. In light of the following: (a) determination of perjury; (b) determination of the State’s jurisdiction; (c) the proper exercise of the State’s jurisdiction; and (d) the primary legislative reason for perjury requires strict punishment; and (c) the Defendant’s responsibility is not mitigated even in light of the specific content of the Defendant’s crime of perjury; (b) determination of the lower court’s punishment that sentenced a reduction of a fine of one million won in the summary order is deemed appropriate; and (c) it cannot be said that it is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.