상습도박등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On December 14, 1999, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 300,000 as a crime of gambling in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and on May 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 2 years for the crime of habitual gambling in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 5 million for the crime of habitual gambling on July 22, 2014. On December 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 6 months for the crime of habitual gambling at the Seocheon Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 5 million for the crime of habitual gambling.
[Criminal facts]
1. On May 12, 2018, from around 22:20 to 01:00 on May 13, 2018 to around 13, 201:00 of the same month, the Defendant: (a) placed O and X signs on both sides of the gambling shed D located in Andong-si, Ansan-si; and (b) placed the amount of money from at least 50,000 to 30,000 won on the O or X, along with other gambling participants; and (c) placed the end number in the sum of the numbers of at least 30,000 to 9,000 won in a way that the sum of the numbers of at least 20 to 30,000 in a place where the Do money is stored, as shown in the attached Table 16th of May 3, 2018.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually stuffed the defendant.
2. Violation of the Traffic Act on roads.
A. On May 12, 2018, at around 21:40, the Defendant driven a scoo vehicle into E without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 91 km section in the area of approximately 91km in the area of the common apartment located in the Gu-si, Si-si, Si-dong to the front road of the “Scood church” located in the area of the Si-si, Si-si and the
B. On May 13, 2018, at around 05:30, the Defendant driven a coo vehicle from the front of the “locked church” to the said cood apartment without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 91 km section, to the said cood apartment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;
1. Each prosecution of C, G, and H.