도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The summary of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.
Judgment
Although the Defendant was found to have been driving on December 13, 2013 on the following day, it was found that the Defendant was found to have been driving on the next day, and the blood alcohol concentration at the time of each crime is 0.151% and 0.175%, so high risk of recidivism is highly high, even though he was in the period of suspension of execution at the time of the crime, he did not know even though he was in the period of suspension of execution, and was absent on the date of the sentence of the judgment of the lower court, and thus, the Defendant did not seem
In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions as shown in the pleadings of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the defendant is inevitable, and the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.
Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.