특수절도등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. On February 18, 2016, the Defendant connected the Defendant with a “bundled 2,” set up a “bundr,” which deals with used goods, etc. at the Suwon University located in Daegu, with the Defendant.
Done at “.........”
The Defendant, who reported and contacted the above writing on the same day, sent the message through the victim B and the “boomer” conversation function and sent the message “120,000 won” immediately.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, at the time of fact, the defendant was 2's house in the racing, and the defendant was 2's school life in Daegu where the defendant was living in his school, and the defendant was paid the price in his school because there was no son 2.
As the victim promised, there was no intention or ability to send the victim a par value to the victim immediately after making the payment.
On February 18, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 120,000 from the damaged party, via the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Defendant, around 22:43.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
B. On May 2016, the Defendant, who committed the crime against the victim D, connected to the Susung University, which traded used goods, etc. at the Susung University located in Daegu, with “diatter,” and sold Quaker Quak Sker for KRW 110,00.
Done at “.........”
On May 6, 2016, the Defendant sent a message to the victim D who reported and contacted the above writing and the victim D and the “bundine” conversation function, and received “di Quaker Quaker Sker Sker’s sker’s sker’s sker’s skat.”
When depositing KRW 110,00,00 is paid, it will send usker Quaker Quaker.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, E was received as a fake from E above, and E knew that it was a household goods by stating to the defendant that it was a household goods, thereby knowing that it was a household goods in India, and that it is a household goods.