폭행등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the part of the facts charged that “the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E (the victim 22 years of age) who had entered the D convenience store located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 17, 2014, and worked there at the same time, and the victim’s “at least 20,000 won will not be a side of the bridge when punishing the bridge.” The part of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime subject to victim’s complaint (Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act). Since the victim revoked the complaint against the Defendant after the instant indictment, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the part that “the Defendant committed assault to the victim in such a way as to detect the victim F (or 15 years of age) who is a high school student before the above D convenience point on May 17, 2014, and to see that the victim “whether he/she has frighted to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to f