However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 9, 2017, around 21:40, the Defendant walked at a place where there was a victim E (65 years old) who had a sound appraisal of the inside while under the influence of alcohol before the apartment D, and knife (17cc in total length, day: 7cc in length: : 7cc in length) which is a dangerous object that was kept after the electric wheelchairs, and knife on the part of the victim, and the Defendant knife “I knife, knife, knife knife knife knife knifs.”

A few fife fife is fife.

“The victim was threatened with the knife of the knife, and the victim was threatened with the knife of the victim.”

[The defendant and his defense counsel held a dispute with the victim at the place specified in the facts charged, but they did not appear at the place specified in the facts charged because they had drinking at a considerably away drinking house from the scene, and there is no fact that the victim had threatened the victim. The victim, etc. knife a knife, which is not owned by the defendant, with a knife onto the front wheelchairs of the defendant and gather the defendant.

The argument is asserted.

Although the defendant carries a knife with a knife, the knife of evidence photographs is not the knife of the defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the fact that the defendant threatened the victim is acknowledged as stated in its reasoning.

The defendant and defense counsel are without merit.

(1) The victim took an oath as a witness in this court, and threatened himself/herself at the time and place stated in the facts charged.

was stated.

The detailed form of intimidation of the defendant, the words of the defendant, and the defendant's statement on the circumstances in which the defendant left the wheel chairs is consistent with the statements made by the investigative agency after being investigated.

It is true that the content was not directly experienced and all was false.

§ 23.