난민불인정처분취소
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding a judgment to this court as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The Plaintiff asserts that, as the grounds for appeal by this court, the Plaintiff’s additional determination in this court is a reason for appeal, that “if the Plaintiff returns to China, the country of nationality, the North Korean women escaping from Korea, and that there is a high risk of suffering from persecution because it is not a non-permission church of the Chinese government, and therefore, the Plaintiff is a well-founded fear of suffering from persecution.”
The above assertion made by the Plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court. The first instance court’s decision rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion on the grounds as seen earlier is justifiable, even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was added to the evidence submitted in this court (Evidence A 3-8).
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.
In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.