1. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant B in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of all of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its holding, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, contrary to

Meanwhile, the argument that the court below erred in the abuse of public prosecution power is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not regard it as the ground for appeal or that the court below did not consider it as the subject of ex officio.

2. According to the records as to Defendant A’s appeal, the above Defendant did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the statutory period, and the petition of appeal does not indicate the grounds for appeal, and it cannot be deemed that the legitimate grounds for appeal were submitted.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.