When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a beauty artist’s license of F’s national technical qualification witness in the name of Kwikset’s name (issuance, Number G, October 8, 2007), using Kwikset’s license from F to F, upon receipt of the E’s request; and (b) operated the above beauty art from November 15, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant borrowed F's national technical qualification certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with respect to F, E, or H;

1. The f-pid Kakao Stockholm messages sent to the victim and photographed by the victim;

1. A copy of the license of a person under consideration;

1. Application of statutes governing A undertaking related to lending of qualification certificates;

1. Article 26 (3) 1 and Article 15 (2) of the Act on the Protection of National Technical Qualifications for Criminal Facts, the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;