교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On April 27, 2016, the Defendant driven D taxi on April 20, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of about 100 km in speed from the direction of the backside to the backside of the white-water in ancient-si.
At the time, a bus center is installed at night and its place is 60 km a speed limit, and a crosswalk is installed immediately in front of the bus stop, and a pedestrian caution has been displayed on the road to board the bus in order to drive the bus frequently, so a person driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly manipulate the steering gear and brake system in order to keep the speed limit and prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brake system in order to prevent accidents.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and talked on the victim E (V) who is a passenger and the destination as soon as possible, but did not go on the front, and the victim F (V, 74 years old) and G (V (V, 62 years old) who crossed the road along the crosswalk at the center of the bus at India, did not go against the front seat of the passenger E who was standing in the front seat of the taxi due to the sudden stoping of the taxi. However, even if the pedestrian signal was not driven at the speed of about 100km/h, which goes above the restricted speed and is not due to the negligence going at the speed of about 10km, the Defendant was able to take the front seat of the passenger E who was standing in the rear seat of the taxi.
At the same time, the Defendant caused the death of the Victim F and the Victim G by the diversous shock by the diversous diversous diversous diverssis respectively, and at the same time, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, who is a passenger, such as the fversal divers, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Report on investigation (verification of speed);
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each death certificate and diagnosis certificate;
1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act.