A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles were employed as the head of the management office of the apartment in which B resides. However, while the apartment management fee of B was in arrears and the apartment management fee of B was awarded to others at auction and it was found that B entered the house, and there was a defect that B entered the house, but there was no fact that he was shoulder as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment below, and the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act that does not go against the social rules.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below comprehensively based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the apartment of the Gu of B, the defendant was awarded a successful bid to the third party by auction; (ii) the successful bidder of the apartment of the apartment of the Gu of B is not fully responsible for the long-term delinquent management expenses; and (iii) the defendant found the house B in B with the above successful bidder for the purpose of entering this issue as the manager B and the above successful bidder, and was waiting in the corridor; (iv) when the defendant and the successful bidder opened a door to communicate with the son, when the defendant and the successful bidder are forced to execute compulsory execution after the son was concealed, the defendant prepared the director's cost, and (iv) the defendant entered the house in B and the body of the injured party in the process of the judgment below, and consistent with the defendant's detailed and consistent statement and the victim's body.