A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 25, 2017, at around 02:30, the Defendants were at the third floor E in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the third floor between the Defendants’ daily behaviors between F and H, the daily behaviors between F and the victim G (24 ). While the Defendants dispute between the Defendants’ daily behaviors and the victim’s daily behaviors, Defendant A took the victim’s head and knee with kne with kne with kne with kne with kne with kne with kne with kne with kne with kne with the victim’s face, and Defendant B took the victim’s face with kne with kne with kne with kne. Defendant B’s head.

The Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the safety of the body and the body of the body of the Defendants, for about three weeks of medical treatment.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, Defendant A assaulted the victim when the victim I (or 29 years of age) tried to see the Defendant who is in the victim’s daily behavior G with violence, knenee and knee with knebbbbbs and kne.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against F, J, H, or K;

1. Each police statement made to G, L, or I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act - Article 2(2)3 of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) - Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. A aggravated criminal defendant: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: The Defendants committed assault against victims who did not have any particular error in sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; the result of the injury inflicted by victims G was considerably significant; however, the Defendants agreed with the victim G, the Defendants did not have any previous conviction, and the Defendants’ participation in the crime late, the degree of the Defendants’ participation, and the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines.