A. In light of the legal principle, while the Defendant was engaged in activities to collect the clothes from the president of the I Council affiliated with the H in Gwangju-si and assist in the formation of a village, the Defendant is a Do-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g

(2) On January 20, 2014, the day of the instant case, the Defendant arrived at the front road of Gwangju City, Gwangju City, and there was only one container other than the Do-type container of this case, and the Defendant appears to have more size and more suitable for the storage of Do-type clothes, and then, the Defendant was transferred to the lower Do-type factory (the seat of the Do-type office) adjacent to the Nolsan church, on the one hand, if the Do-type container fell short of 1 km in the initial location.

(3) The Defendant knew that all of the above two containers were owned by Do-do-si-si-si-si-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type-type

5. Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent of unlawful acquisition in larceny, thereby affecting the conclusion of judgment.