2. The Defendants recognized the facts charged of this case and did not have any criminal records of the same kind or fine to Defendant A, and they did not have any criminal records of the same kind. However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendants under the lack of intellectual ability, and thus, the commission of commercial sex acts is not good. In particular, Defendant A continued to engage in commercial sex acts by forcing the victims to engage in commercial sex acts for a period of three months with the victim living together with the victim in his/her own residence, and even after the victim returned to his/her house, the commission of commercial sex acts was attempted to find the victim even after the victim returned to his/her house, one time of punishment for another crime, one time of suspension of execution, three criminal records, and three criminal records, and the equality between the case where the Defendants were to be judged at the same time with the use of the computer, etc. for which the judgment became final, and the court below determined the punishment against the above Defendant in consideration of these circumstances, and the Defendants’ physical or mental harm to the victim's family relationship, and thus, the Defendants did not make any other reasons for the defendants' allegation.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and thus, it is in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.