When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

B As the representative director of the Bank of Korea, D is a person who has been awarded a contract for F-built construction work on three parcels, including the management population E, and G, H, I, and J are employees belonging to the Bank of Bankruptcy C, Defendant, and K are subordinate business operators of the said Bank of Bankruptcy Co., Ltd.

When the construction has been delayed due to the dispute over the progress payment amount and the payment method of progress payment of the construction project at issue, D terminated the contract with the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. on August 21, 2013, and simultaneously filed a lawsuit against the State Co., Ltd to compensate for the damages due to the delay in the construction project at the same time, and it concluded a contract with the State Co., Ltd on September 27, 2013 and conducted the construction project.

1. Defendant B, G, H, I, J Defendant B, G, G, H, H, H, H, I, and J conspired on October 21, 2013 and interfere with the work of the parts belonging to (i) Aussia Water Industry and (ii) the construction of the second floor of the building, when the parts belonging to (ii) the construction of the construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the second floor of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the building of the Defendant B, G, H, I, and J, by hanging in the construction of the new construction of the new construction of the two.

2. On October 22, 2013, Defendant B, G, K Defendant B, B, G, and K conspired and interfere with the work by force by failing to perform construction works by preventing (i) the construction works from being conducted by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, (ii) the construction site, (iii) the construction of a plug card indicating the lien by using a bridge vehicle, and (iv) the construction of a plug card indicating the lien by letting the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport start up the remaining construction at the construction site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against B, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Application of statutes on police statements concerning L;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act for the Detention of Labor House Head.